Legal Opinion
People v. Brooks
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 1, 2011PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty (see CPL 220.60 [3]). The record establishes that the defendant’s plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made. While the presentence report indicated that the defendant had been diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and bipolar disorder, there is no basis in the record to support the conclusion that, at the time of the plea proceeding, the defendant lacked the capacity to understand the nature of the proceeding or the consequences of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. DouglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. M'LadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. DeBenedettoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. StephensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. AnlyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. BlaylockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. Carmichael (David)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.