Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Leonard

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1919No. 9090PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Denver District Court, Hon. John A. Perry, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

The first question for consideration is the validity of this contract of separation. There is nothing in it which, under the laws of Colorado, is against public policy.

Attorneys for plaintiff in error urge that inasmuch as this contract fails to set forth a good cause for the separation, the contract is invalid. They admit that if a separation is “inevitable,” whether a property settlement is made or not, then a separation agreement settling the property rights of the parties may be made without violating public policy; but they further contend that such separation must, in the first…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chase v. ChaseSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1897
  2. Daniels v. BenedictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  3. Reed v. ReedMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. French v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Estate of McNuttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Joyner v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Le Bert-Francis v. Le Bert-FrancisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Taylor v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Matthews v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API