Legal Opinion

Kelli Jo Griffin v. Paul Pate, in His Official Capacities as the Secretary of State of Iowa, and Denise Fraise, in Her Official Capacities as the County Auditor of Lee County, Iowa

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 30, 2016No. 15–1661Published

1Dissent · WigginsWiggins, Justice

In Chiodo v. Section Panel, I was compelled to dissent from the plurality decision. 846 N.W.2d 845, 863-65 (Iowa 2014) (Wiggins, J., dissenting). In doing so, I made two points. The first was that it is this court’s duty and- obligation, not the legislature’s, to interpret the meaning of the phrase “infamous crime” in article II, section 5 of the Iowa' Constitution. Id. at 864. It appears from the opinions filed today, the court agrees with this principle. Today, I reaffirm my position on this point of law.

I also agree with the court’s view that the Iowa Constitution is a living document. *206As…

Also in this document: Dissent · Hecht; Dissent · Appel.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Illinois State Board of Elections v. Socialist Workers PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Hunter v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Richardson v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API