Legal Opinion

State v. Whitmore

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 22, 2005No. E-04-044PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Singer, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} This matter is on appeal from an order of the Sandusky Municipal Court denying the return of seized property to a former criminal defendant. For the following reasons, we reverse.

{¶ 2} On February 27, 2000, appellant, Carl W. Whitmore, called the Sandusky police and requested that officers come to his residence immediately. The officers noted in their report that appellant’s speech was slurred, his eyes were bloodshot, and he appeared intoxicated. Appellant showed them a firearm lying on an arm of a chair and stated, “Here’s my gun.” A confrontation ensued after…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GlantonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State v. MayfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Toledo v. Mroczkowski, Unpublished Decision (10-28-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. ShabaaOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
  5. Whitmore v. City of Sandusky, E-08-031 (12-12-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API