Legal Opinion

Lanier v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 26, 1953No. 14790PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant (appellee) in a personal injury action tried to a jury. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant, without resting its case, moved for a directed verdict, which the District Court granted. This appeal followed the entry of the judgment on the verdict. The sole question for decision is whether, under the plaintiff’s evidence and the applicable substantive law of Arkansas, the defendant was entitled to a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence.

On July 21, 1951, the plaintiff, while…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coca Cola Bottling Co. Of Black Hills v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  3. Barnett v. Terminal R. Ass'n of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. SnugginsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  5. Menser v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alma Stofer v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  2. Charles A. Anglen v. Braniff Airways, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  3. Bonnie Hobbs v. Lloyd Allen RenickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  4. Marvin Fain v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API