Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: The Court of Claims properly awarded consequential damages for the condemnation of a portion of claimant’s parcel of land. The evidence at trial supports the court’s conclusion that claimant constructed excess subway conduits in "reasonable anticipation of future needs” and that the condemnation prevented claimant from ever fully utilizing the reserve capacity (Matter of Onondaga County Water Dist. v Board of Assessors, 39 NY2d 601, 604, 605-606). The fact that claimant did not establish that the appropriation actually frustrated existing plans for expansion is not dispositive.
Defe…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Antone v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Onondaga County Water District v. Board of AssessorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- Huff v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re Quinn S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001