Legal Opinion
Stanford v. Paul W. Heard & Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 17, 1999No. A99A0804PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Barnes, Judge.
Jack M. Stanford appeals the grant of summary judgment to Paul W. Heard & Company (“Heard & Company”) on his claim alleging tortious interference with employment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligence in publishing his drug test results. He also appeals the dismissal of his claim for statutory penalties under 29 USC § 1132 (c) (1) because Heard & Company failed to give him timely notice of his rights under the Comprehensive Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (“COBRA”). We disagree and affirm.
Stanford was an employee of Heard & Company until his employment…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Moore v. Goldome Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Desai v. Silver Dollar City, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Manderson & Associates, Inc. v. GoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Lane v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Northside Hospital, Inc. v. RuotanenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Comcast Corp. v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Amick v. BM & KM, INC.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2003
- Jenkins v. Sallie Mae, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Sumter Regional Hospital, Inc. v. Healthworks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.