Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Tucker v. Walker

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 17, 1969No. 5-4801Published

1Concurrence

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

I concur in the majority opinion. Yet there is one important portion treated therein about which I am uncertain. That is the basis for disposition of point three, having to do with the doctrine of destructibility of contingent remainders. 1 cannot tell Avhether the majority is rejecting or approving the doctrine. The opinion does not relate the particular facts Avhich make 'the doctrine inapplicable.

Samuel P. Walker had one son and two daughters, one of Avhom died wdthout issue. After his conveyance to Samuel P. Walker, Jr., but before the latter’s deed to Turner,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Henderson v. GladishSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  2. Hays v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
  3. Rogers v. OgburnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  4. LeSieur v. SpikesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  5. Blocker v. BlockerSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API