Legal Opinion

Mabry v. Merchants' Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 13, 1923No. 12261PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 3. Error from District Court, Sequoyah County; E. B. Arnold, Judge. Action by Merchants’ National Bank of Sallisaw, Okla., against M. H. Mabry to recover on promissory note. Judgment.in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

This is an. action brought by the plaintiff, Merchants’ National Bank of Sallisaw, against the defendant, 51. H. Mabry, wherein the plaintiff seeks to recover judgment for the balance claimed to be due on a promissory note, and for possession of 100 head of cattle of the value of $60 per head and foreclosure of the plaintiff’s chattel mortgage on said cattle. The parties hereto will be designated as they appeared in the court below.

This cause was tried to a jury and upon the conclusion of all the evidence, the plaintiff moved for a directed verdict, which motion was by the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Metropolitan National Bank of New York v. LoydNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Ayres v. Farmers & Merchants BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Mann v. Second National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  5. Noble v. DoughtenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API