Legal Opinion

Driggers v. Colonial Ins.

Fairfax County Circuit Court

Decided December 6, 1994No. Case No. (Chancery) 134915PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Arthur B. Vieregg, Jr,

This action for declaratory relief came before this court upon the demurrer of the defendant, Colonial Insurance Company of California. Both the plaintiff, Stephanie Driggers (“Driggers”), an infant suing by her next Mend, Janet Driggers, and Colonial agree that no material facts are in dispute and that this court’s resolution of two issues raised by Colonial in its demurrer is dispositive of this case. Accordingly, this court will treat Colonial’s demurrer as a motion for summary judgment.

I. Facts

The following undisputed facts frame this legal dispute.

On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reisen v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  2. Midwest Mutual Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  4. Criterion Insurance v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1970
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. KellySupreme Court of Virginia · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martirosov v. Shenandoah Flight Services, Inc.Rockingham County Circuit Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API