Legal Opinion

Concerning the Wage Claim of Harker v. Peterson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2003No. 01-899Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Gail A. Peterson (Gail) appeals the determination of the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Sanders County, that she bears joint and several liability with her ex-husband Donald C. Peterson (Donald) for the unpaid salary, penalties, attorney fees and court costs awarded to Kathy J. Harker (Harker). We reverse.

¶2 The issue on appeal is whether the District Court’s conclusion that a partnership existed between Gail and Donald from June 1997 through August 1998 was correct.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶3 Gail and Donald married in Alaska in 1984. The couple purchased real property along…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bender v. BenderMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In Re Estate of BolingerMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Pruitt v. FettyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Small v. Board of TrusteesMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Baldridge v. Board of Trustees, Rosebud County School District 19Montana Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API