Employers Surplus Insurance v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.
This is the second appeal in this case. Employers’ Surplus Lines Insurance Company (“ESLIC”) makes several arguments in support of its contention in this appeal that the trial court erred when it denied ESLIC’s motion for attorney’s fees. We find no merit in ESLIC’s arguments and affirm the trial court.
In the first appeal, we briefly summarized the history of this case as follows:
Murphy Oil USA, Inc., the appellee, filed suit in Union County against a number of its insurance carriers seeking a declaration that the carriers were obligated under certain general…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gannett River States Publishing Co. v. Arkansas Industrial Development CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Unigard Security Insurance v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Estate of Wood v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Muncrief v. GreenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Village Market, Inc. v. State Farm General InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dupwe v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. v. KrouseCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Dupwe v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2002
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.