Legal Opinion

Koppers Co. v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

There is no dispute as to questions of fact. The trial court found that the income derived by plaintiff from property located or business transacted within the state of Wisconsin during the period in question was from the following items only:

Rentals of shed and typewriter. $1,236 73

On account of materials purchased and sold by plaintiff in Wisconsin.A :. 9,674 60

On account of the brick stacks.:. 10,147 .73

On account of the salary of engineer and expert brickman. 4,784 80

$25,843 86

Uppn such items but $1,450.94 w^s properly chargeable to plaintiff for income tax for the year 1922, under the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States Glue Co. v. Town of Oak CreekSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. Arkansas Ex Rel. Ashley Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. United States Glue Co. v. Town of Oak CreekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. F. A. Patrick & Co. v. DeschampWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Wolf Co. v. KutchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Surface Combustion Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API