Legal Opinion

Cortez-Guillen v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 5, 2010No. 09-72358PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BEA, Circuit Judge:

A Mexican, now a lawful permanent U.S. resident, was convicted in Alaska of criminal “coercion.” We must now decide whether that state-law conviction constitutes a “crime of violence” under Federal Immigration law. If so, he is subject to removal from this country.

We hold that the Alaska “coercion” conviction does not necessarily equate with a federal “crime of violence” and grant the petition and remand to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) for further proceedings.

I

Jose Cortez-Guillen, a native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States on July 6, 1973, as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Cerezo v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Fernandez-Ruiz v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Young v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Ludwin Lopez-Aguilar v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Rosario v. United States Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API