Cortez-Guillen v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BEA, Circuit Judge:
A Mexican, now a lawful permanent U.S. resident, was convicted in Alaska of criminal “coercion.” We must now decide whether that state-law conviction constitutes a “crime of violence” under Federal Immigration law. If so, he is subject to removal from this country.
We hold that the Alaska “coercion” conviction does not necessarily equate with a federal “crime of violence” and grant the petition and remand to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) for further proceedings.
I
Jose Cortez-Guillen, a native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States on July 6, 1973, as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cerezo v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Fernandez-Ruiz v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Young v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Ludwin Lopez-Aguilar v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Rosario v. United States Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020