Comstock v. Paie & Smith
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal Erom the court op the first judicial district. This appeal comes up from a judgment obtained by the plaintiffs against the garnishee in this case. ,The plaintiffs had recovered a judgment for $728 against Antonio Paie, one of the defendants, as' the . value of certain flour they had sold to him and Smith, for cash, hut which had. not been paid, and which was sequestered, and bonded by the defendant, Paie, with Bartlette, the garnishee, as surety.— This judgment was…
Read the full summary
Appeal Erom the court op the first judicial district. This appeal comes up from a judgment obtained by the plaintiffs against the garnishee in this case. ,The plaintiffs had recovered a judgment for $728 against Antonio Paie, one of the defendants, as' the . value of certain flour they had sold to him and Smith, for cash, hut which had. not been paid, and which was sequestered, and bonded by the defendant, Paie, with Bartlette, the garnishee, as surety.— This judgment was signed the 80th May, 1839. The flour was sold by the sheriff and the proceeds paid over to Bartlette the attorney of Paie…
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The diselo-sure of the time receiving and certain monies a».attorney %vho is gar-«¡shred, which he had received on account of not he^objected professional8^ ^ ^ ^ ^ attorney, when nishee, to an-tories,lntreqiur-te state, he had not received certain Sient, ami if lie paid if over*1 to state ~w^len lfe paid it, and to 'whom, and he refused to answer, on the fvOTdd* be^dis*g¡°aa|S Pconfi-f£ntce:Ie Held’ bound to an-refusal is an for tt»*5 whole debt, costs and damages.
This is an attachment case. Judgment was obtained against the defendants for the sum of seven hundred and twenty-eight dollars; and…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Travis v. JanuarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
- State National Bank v. BoatnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887