Legal Opinion

Lane v. Howard

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1858PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from Caldwell. Tried before the Hon. Alexander W. Terrell. The facts of the caso are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

In this case Howard, the defendant in error, instituted suit in the District Court, against Lane, on a promissory note for the sum of eighty dollars. The petition alleged that the sum due upon the note was a part of the purchase money of certain lots described in the petition, which lots were alleged to be of the value of two hundred dollars. The prayer of the *8petition was, that the vendor’s lien upon the lots (which was asserted in the petition) might be established, and the lots sold in satisfaction of the amount due upon the note. The judgment was in accordance with the prayer of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marshall v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cotulla v. Thomas Goggan & Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hillebrand v. McMahanTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Texas & New Orleans Ry. Co. v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. Rowan v. Shapard, Stevens & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1884
  5. Lawson v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API