Legal Opinion

Cuyler v. Allstate Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 7, 2007No. A07A0461PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

Acting pro se, Matthew Cuyler appeals an order granting summary judgment to his insurer Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”), arguing that the trial court erred in (1) denying him a jury trial; (2) having counsel for Allstate draft the summary judgment order; and (3) finding that no issues of fact remained as to whether Allstate failed to comply with its insurance policy. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Britt v. Kelly & Picerne, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Service Merchandise, Inc. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Collier v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Fuller v. FullerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Turner v. GATEWAY INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Gilchrist v. GilchristCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Greater Georgia Life Insurance Co. v. EasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Scott v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. Zurich American Insurance Co. v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API