Legal Opinion
Weidman v. Tomaselli
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided December 10, 1975PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. Final judgment affirmed with $25 costs.
Upon review of the issues presented, this court agrees with the decision of the County Court (81 Misc 2d 328) that clause 32 of the lease is unconscionable. We find it unnecessary at this time to pass on the alternative bases suggested by the court below.
Concur: Hogan P. J., Glickman and Farley, JJ.
2Cases cited1 opinion
3Cited by16 opinions
- Martinez v. Continental EnterprisesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- In Re Westview 74th Street Drug Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Vargas Realty Enterprises, Inc. v. CFA W. 111 Street, L.L.C. (In Re Vargas Realty Enterprises, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- N. V. Madison, Inc. v. SaurweinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1980
- Hertz Corp. v. Attorney-General of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.