Legal Opinion

Van Tuil v. Carroll

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 9, 1972No. 55422PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adesko

The plaintiff, Norbert Van Tuil, brought an action against defendant Lewis Carroll for libelous defamation of his character allegedly resulting from the mailing, by defendant to plaintiff’s employer of a carbon copy of a letter. The trial court entered an order sustaining defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint and dismissing the suit at plaintiff’s cost. On appeal the plaintiff contends that the trial court improperly interpreted and applied the rule of innocent construction.

The rule of innocent construction provides that words allegedly libelous that are capable of being read…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zeinfeld v. Hayes Freight Lines, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Brewer v. Hearst Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  3. Kulesza v. Chicago Daily News, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  4. Parmelee v. Hearst Pub. Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  5. LaGrange Press v. Citizen Publishing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Valentine v. North American Co. for Life & Health InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Delis v. SepsisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. Antonelli v. Field Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Ashe v. HatfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Watson v. Southwest Messenger Press, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API