Bralus Corp. v. Berger
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Respondent’s mechanic’s lien for making1 ‘ drawings of preliminary plans ” and allied architectural services which never became embodied in an erected structure, should not summarily be dismissed on motion under subdivision (6) of section 19 of the Lien Law, upon the ground that they are not final plans. Mechanic’s liens may be filed for materials furnished or labor performed “ for the improvement of real property ” (Lien Law, § 3). Subdivision 4 of section 2, as amended by chapter 608 of the Laws of 1934, defines “ improvement ” as including “ the drawing by any architect or engineer or…
2Cited by3 opinions
- David Rivera v. Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, The Matter of Leonardo Enriquez v. Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
- In re Country Village Heights CondominiumNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- Atlantic Cement Co. v. St. Lawrence Cement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964