Legal Opinion

Hanna v. Spotts' Heirs

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 30, 1845PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Ewing

Hanna filed his bill in the Hancock Circuit Court, against the administrator and infant heirs of Samuel Spotts, deceased, setting up a demand on two notes, one for $484, with interest from the 16th November, 1832, which he charges had been assigned to him by Edward Colston; the other for $1,800, with interest from the 23d July, 1833, which he claims to have been assigned to him by Wm. G. Hawes. Both of these notes he alledges were executed by said Spotts, in his lifetime, and the former for the last instalment due upon a contract for the purchase of a tract of land from the executor of…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kingsbury v. BucknerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Buffalo Loan, Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Knights Templar & Masonic Mutual Aid Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. B.L., T. S.D. Co. v. . K.T. M.M.A. Assn.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R. v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. Johnson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API