Aultman & Taylor Co. v. Syme
New York Supreme Court
1Per curiam
It is claimed upon the part of the appellant that the motion to set aside the orders for examination in this case should have been granted, because the judgment in the action was entered on the 14th of November, 1889, and the execution, which formed the foundation of those orders, was issued on the 14th of November, 1894, and therefore not issued within five years after the entry of judgment; and the question to be determined is whether, in the calculation of time, as prescribed by law, the first day is to be included in the computation or not. It seems to us, upon an examination of the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Aultman Taylor Co. v. . SymeNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- People v. . BurgessNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Grant v. PaddockOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Aultman & Taylor Co. v. SymeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Aultman Taylor Co. v. . SymeNew York Court of Appeals · 1900