Clair Smith v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
The simple question presented on this appeal is whether taxpayer was head of a household, as defined in § 1(b) (2) (A) (i), et seq. of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.
It was stipulated that taxpayer maintained two homes, one in Nevada, one in California; that she paid more than one-half of the expenses of each home; that taxpayer was not married and was not a surviving spouse; that the home in California was maintained for taxpayer’s adopted son, who lived in it and used it as Ms principal place of abode as a member of that household.
The statute reads as follows:
“§ 1.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commissioner v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Coady v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
- United States v. W. W. Marett and Ruth MarettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
3Cited by42 opinions
- Estate of Boeshore v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
- Grace v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
- Dobra v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1998
- W. E. Grace v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- National Life and Accident Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.