Legal Opinion

Clair Smith v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 3, 1964No. 18958_1PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge.

The simple question presented on this appeal is whether taxpayer was head of a household, as defined in § 1(b) (2) (A) (i), et seq. of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

It was stipulated that taxpayer maintained two homes, one in Nevada, one in California; that she paid more than one-half of the expenses of each home; that taxpayer was not married and was not a surviving spouse; that the home in California was maintained for taxpayer’s adopted son, who lived in it and used it as Ms principal place of abode as a member of that household.

The statute reads as follows:

“§ 1.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Coady v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
  3. United States v. W. W. Marett and Ruth MarettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Estate of Boeshore v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  2. Grace v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  3. Dobra v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1998
  4. W. E. Grace v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. National Life and Accident Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API