Legal Opinion
Sanders v. Midstates Oil Corp.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 14, 1942No. 9257PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McClendon, chief justice.
Rule 37 case. The appeal is from a final judgment cancelling a permit to drill an oil well on a .18-acre tract, which was voluntarily segregated from a .58-acre tract, which latter had previously been voluntarily segregated from a 5-acre tract in the East Texas Oil Field; and enjoining production thereunder. The appeal is by Sanders (the permittee) and the Railroad Commission.
The permit was. applied for and the application granted as a protective well to the .18 a. tract, independently of the needs of the 5 a. tract for an additional well. However, the evidence showed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Webster v. Texas & Pacific Motor Transport Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Boatner v. Providence-Washington Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Railroad Commission v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Railroad Commission v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alice Margaret Krug v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Railroad Commission v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943