Legal Opinion

United States v. Miller

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided May 7, 1996No. ACM 31206PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCHREIER, Senior Judge:

Among other issues, this case requires us to address the drafting of Article 134 specifications not listed in the Manual For Courts-Martial, United States (MCM), Part IV, paragraph 60 (1984). Contrary to his pleas, members convicted appellant of four incidents of pandering by wrongfully enticing a female to engage in a sexual act for hire, three specifications of obstruction of justice, and one specification each of showing pornography to minors, supplying alcohol to minors, assault, and an attempted indecent act with a minor. Articles 134, 128, 92,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. RuppelUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  3. United States v. MillerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  4. United States v. MillerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API