United States v. Miller
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCHREIER, Senior Judge:
Among other issues, this case requires us to address the drafting of Article 134 specifications not listed in the Manual For Courts-Martial, United States (MCM), Part IV, paragraph 60 (1984). Contrary to his pleas, members convicted appellant of four incidents of pandering by wrongfully enticing a female to engage in a sexual act for hire, three specifications of obstruction of justice, and one specification each of showing pornography to minors, supplying alcohol to minors, assault, and an attempted indecent act with a minor. Articles 134, 128, 92,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. RuppelUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
- United States v. MillerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
- United States v. MillerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000