Legal Opinion

Kelly v. First Virginia Bank-Southwest

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 19, 1991No. 901144PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

404 S.E.2d 723 (1991)

Kimberly KELLY, Appellant,

v.

FIRST VIRGINIA BANK-SOUTHWEST, et al., Appellees.

No. 901144.

Supreme Court of Virginia.

April 19, 1991.

D. Tillar, Long & Long, Blacksburg, for Kimberly Kelly.

G.C. Hancock-Gilmer & Sadler, Pulaski, T.T. Lawson, Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, Roanoke, for First Virginia Bank.

Present: All the Justices.

Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and arguments of counsel, the Court is of opinion that the allegations in appellant's motion for judgment do not bring this action within the subject-matter jurisdiction of the trial court. See Haddon v.…

Also in this document: Dissent · Lacy; Dissent · Hassell.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Bradshaw v. AronovitchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  3. R & T INVESTMENTS, LTD. v. JohnsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  4. City of Richmond v. BraxtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  5. Haddon v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Middlekauff v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  2. Carr v. City of NorfolkCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  3. Beardsley v. IsomDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
  4. Fox v. Rich Products Corp.Winchester County Circuit Court · 1994
  5. Beardsley v. IsomDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API