Newberry v. Allstate Insurance Co.

OPINION

CARL B. JONES, Vice-Chief Judge:

¶ 1 The question presented in this uninsured motorist coverage case is whether a city-owned vehicle was an “uninsured motor vehicle” within the meaning of our UM statute, 36 O.S.Supp.1994 § 3636(C). The trial court held it was not, and entered summary judgment in favor of insurer. We agree, and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

¶2 Raymond Newberry was injured in August, 1995, when the ear he was driving collided with one owned by the City of Oklahoma City [City] and driven by a City employee. His personal representative1 [hereafter Appellant] commenced…