Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Campbell

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 2002Published

1ConcurrenceRosenblatt, J.

I write separately to explain-why I concur in the Court’s opinion.

In Supreme Court, defendant moved unsuccessfully to dismiss the indictment, based on his claim that the court delayed unreasonably in sentencing him. As this Court points out, defendant used four aliases, nine different dates of birth, five inconsistent places of birth and was the subject of four different NYSID numbers, along with numerous bench warrants. Considering that defendant’s evasiveness prevented the court from sentencing him promptly, his claim of unreasonable delay elevates “chutzpah” to new heights.

Surely this was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. EspinalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API