Legal Opinion

Harkness v. Devine

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1889No. 6339PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Erio. Tried below before Hon. D. P. Marr.

1Opinion of the Court

Henry, Associate Justice—

This is an action of trespass to try title.

The defendant pleaded not guilty and plaintiff recovered judgment for the land. The land in controversy is 5,313,989 square varas, patented to Jose de la Garza as assignee of Nepumaceno Nanez, and is correctly described by metes and bounds in plaintiff’s petition.

Plaintiff undertook to deraign title from the grantee, one link in the chain being a deed from the patentee Garza to R. T. Higginbotham, in which the only description of the land conveyed is in these words, to-wit: “ One-third of a league of land purchased by me of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cook v. Oliver, GuardianTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Davis v. Kirby Lumber Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Alexander v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API