Legal Opinion

New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 30, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The appeal of the Mill Company from the refusal of the trial court to add certain paragraphs to the finding is without merit; the matters referred to are either already properly set forth as conclusions, are not admitted or undisputed, or are immaterial. The finding as to custom, sought to be stricken out, is, as will hereafter appear, both relevant and material.

The first question raised by the bank’s appeal relates to the correctness of the court’s conclusion as to the duty of the bank in the premises. The duty of a bank, receiving a bill of exchange for presentment and acceptance, in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. PRESIDENT AND DIRECTORS OF THE BANK OF WASHINGTON v. Triplett & NealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Skiff v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  3. Harris v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Sahlien v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Davis v. First National Bank of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adams County v. Meadows Valley BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Siano v. HelveringDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1936
  3. Klein v. MunsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API