Denham v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County ; W. W. Harralson, Judge. William A. Denham was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals. The affidavit and complaint sufficiently •appear from the opinion. The following charges were refused the defendant: (1-3) There is no evidence that the defendant disposed of any liquor to witness Beard on the night in question.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County ; W. W. Harralson, Judge. William A. Denham was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals. The affidavit and complaint sufficiently •appear from the opinion. The following charges were refused the defendant: (1-3) There is no evidence that the defendant disposed of any liquor to witness Beard on the night in question. (4) You have the right to consider all the testimony to arrive at the motives as well as the acts of the witnesses, and, if you have a reasonable doubt as to whether the liquor belonged to Denham or to Beard, then the…
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
2Per curiam
Application for rehearing overruled. Howze v. State, 16 Ala. App. 76, 75 South. 624; Barefield v. State, 14 Ala. App. 638, 72 South. 293; Howie v. State, 1 Ala. App. 228, 56 South. 37; Sellers v. State, 98 Ala. 72, 13 South. 530; McIntosh v. State, 140 Ala. 137, 37 South. 223; Untreinor v. State, 146 Ala. 133, 41 South. 170; Guarreno v. State, 148 Ala. 637, 42 South. 833; Joyner v. State, 16 Ala. App. 240, 77 South. 78.
3Cases cited8 opinions
- McIntosh v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
- Untreinor v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Guarreno v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Barefield v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
- Joyner v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.