State v. Lovelass
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZMAN, Judge.
A jury found Keith Lovelass guilty of possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, in violation of I.C. § 37-2732(c)(1). On appeal, Lovelass argues that his conviction should be reversed for the following reasons: (1) the trial judge abused his discretion by questioning Lovelass in the jury’s presence; (2) the prosecutor engaged in misconduct; and (3) trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Alternatively, Love-lass argues that if none of the preceding errors constitute reversible error, the totality of the errors require reversal of his judgment of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith Wayne FREDERICK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- State v. HaggardIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. CampbellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. SheahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. StevensIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. PhillipsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. LovelaceIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. SmithIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.