Legal Opinion

R. Hoe & Co. v. Goss Printing Press Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 7, 1929No. 46PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtL. Hand, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). [1] The claims in suit are for combinations of four main elements: The sliding swing; the balance; the locking means to draw on and secure the “drag”; the same means to push it away. Of these the most important is the first. Yiewed merely as movement, Cruse discovered -nothing new; his “drag” occupies the same series of positions in its course as Scott’s; the whole body is translated substantially horizontally at the same time that it rotates on its own axis. It is a matter of small moment if in either ease the center of gravity does not move in a strictly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kirsch Mfg. Co. v. Gould Mersereau Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  2. H. C. White Co. v. Morton E. Converse & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  3. Spalding v. John WanamakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  4. Auto Pneumatic Action Co. v. Kindler & CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  5. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Condit Electrical Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Anton Lorenz v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Esme E. Rosaire v. Baroid Sales Division, National Lead CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. Buono v. Yankee Maid Dress CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  4. Denominational Envelope Co. v. Duplex Envelope Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  5. Dow Chemical Co. v. Williams Bros. Well Treating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API