Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Day

Dauphin County Court of Quarter Sessions

Decided September 26, 1933No. 153Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hargest, P. J.,

This case has been tried twice and was the subject of two previous opinions, due to the uncertain way in which the writer, as the trial judge, submitted it to the jury upon the first trial.

The defendants were charged with the fraudulent conversion of an automobile and the proceeds thereof, and also with larceny by bailee of that car. At the first trial, held December 11, 1929, it appeared that the defendants were part*137ners in the automobile business. On January 2,1929, Harry A. Hartzell, prosecutor, purchased from the defendants an Auburn cabriolet automobile, giving in payment…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Commonwealth v. CurrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Commonwealth v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. McCreary v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
  5. Commonwealth of Pa. v. RosserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API