Town of Greenburgh v. Bobandal Realties, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.
This action stems from an attempt by respondent, Town of G-reenburgh, to enjoin appellants from using two parcels of land (37A and 19A), owned by the corporate appellant, Bobandal Realties, Inc., for purposes allegedly not permitted uses under the town’s present zoning ordinance.
We are presented with the affirmed finding of fact — and it is undisputed—that appellant Bobandal, at the time the present zoning ordinance took effect, was operating a restaurant and bar on parcel 19A and a swimming pool on the adjoining parcel 37A. It is further undisputed that these parcels are situated in a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- McGovern v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Matter of City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- In re SimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- City of Glens Falls v. Standard Oil Co.New York Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. MazzochettiJustice Court of Town of Irondequoit · 1998
- Town of Coeymans v. Malphrus, New York County Courts1979
- Matter of Cobleskill Stone Prods., Inc. v. Town of SchoharieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019