Legal Opinion

Plain City Irr. Co. v. Hooper Irr. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1935No. 5580PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

In 1921 an action was brought by the plaintiff, Plain City Irrigation Company, against the defendant Hooper Irrigation Company to ascertain and determine the respective rights, priorities, and uses of water between the original named parties. While it does not appear that the state engineer had either begun or completed a survey of the Weber river system as the suggested procedure is outlined by section 21, c. 67, Laws of Utah 1919, it does appear that by stipulation of the original parties and upon an order of the court, the state engineer was directed to take proof and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. District Court of Second Judicial District in and for Morgan CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Huntsville Irr. Ass'n v. District Court of Weber CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Rights to the Use of WaterUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Shurtz v. ThorleyUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Enervest, Ltd. v. Utah State EngineerUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  4. EnerVest v. Utah State EngineerUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Watson v. District Court of First Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Cache CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API