Legal Opinion

United States v. John Doe

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 9, 2003No. 02-50445PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAHAN, District Judge.

John Doe appeals the district court’s denial of the government’s second motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) for reduction of the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to import cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960 and 963.

The district court originally sentenced Doe to 210-months imprisonment. It later corrected the sentence to 185 months and 9 days and then granted the government’s first Rule 35(b) motion, reducing the sentence to 95 months. In the second Rule 35(b) motion, the government asserted that it had mistakenly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Bernal Chavarria-HerraraCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. ManellaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Okwudiri R. Arishi, AKA Remy Arishi, R. ArisiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Darrin E. MalleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. ThornsburyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. ClawsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. PooleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API