Legal Opinion

Claybrooks v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1971No. State 27PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The defendant’s assignment of error is that the trial court failed to give adequate instructions as to all the necessary elements of armed robbery. If the defendant’s position is correct and the inadequacy was prejudicial, the defendant’s remedy is a new trial.

Both parties recognize that an erroneous jury instruction is a trial court error and that it is not reviewable as a matter of right in this court on appeal unless a motion for a new trial based upon such error was made in the trial court. While this rule is not to be taken lightly for the reasons set forth in the cases cited in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. RuudWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Schwamb v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Boyles v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. KuickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Manna v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thiesen v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. StaplesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  3. State v. ChildsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. Knotwell v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API