Legal Opinion

Chaykin v. Kant

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 3, 1976No. 74-1332PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

327 So.2d 793 (1976)

David CHAYKIN, Appellant,

v.

Joan KANT et al., Appellees.

No. 74-1332.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 3, 1976.

Rehearing Denied March 3, 1976.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Hansford D. Tyler, Jr., and David D. Phillips, Miami, for appellant.

Cushman & Cushman, Miami, Robert W. Rust, U.S. Atty., Mary-Ella Johnson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Barry Kutun, Coal Gables, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and NATHAN, JJ.

2Per curiam

David Chaykin, plaintiff in the trial court, brought suit against Jon R. Kant and Terry A. Kant, the heirs of Samuel J. Kant, deceased, to foreclose…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bosem v. BosemDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. Light v. KingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  3. Burton v. McMillanSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  4. Chesser v. ChesserSupreme Court of Florida · 1914

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pelle v. GlantzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. Bosem v. A. R. A. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Kremser v. TonokaboniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. McHale v. Kohut (In re Ocean Beach Club, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API