Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Ott
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 1, 1983Published
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The plaintiff, Anne T. Gordon, sued to recover damages for personal injuries she received after using a deodorant manufactured by the defendants, the Gillette Company and E. I. DuPont deNemours and Company. She named Rochester General as a codefendant, claiming that it negligently failed to diagnose her injuries. The hospital cross-claimed against the two manufacturing corpora*975tions and moved against them, pursuant to CPLR 3130, for leave of court to serve written interrogatories and also conduct oral depositions. Special Term denied leave.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barouh Eaton Allen Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- L.K. Comstock & Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Katz v. PosnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Clifton Steel Corp. v. County of Monroe Public Works DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980