Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance v. Hazlitt Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 1934Published

1DissentO’Malley, J.

The question here involved is whether a receiver of real property in foreclosure may be sued by a tenant for acts of passive negligence, as distinguished from those of affirmative negligence.

In this Department it has been the general, if not the invariable rule, to deny such right. This practice has been founded upon the decision of this court in Matter of Fischer (168 App. Div. 326). Such decision is also the basis of text book writers for a similar holding (1 Wiltsie Mort. Forec. [4th ed.] § 619, p. 792; 3 Jones Mort. [8th ed.] § 1951, pp. 435, 436).

Matter of Fischer (supra) proceeded,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Prudence Co. v. 160 West Seventy-Third Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Fischer v. GlaserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  3. Gabriele v. Kent Realty Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
  4. City Real Estate Co. v. Realty Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API