Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stamper v. Gammill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 2, 1960No. 38764Published

1DissentBerry, Justice

I am unable to agree with the majority opinion.

It is stated in substance in Stamper’s amended petition that the Reserve National Insurance Company is a mutual insurance company; that the policy-holders do not participate in profits earned by said company and that the profits earned inure to the benefit of Gammill because of his control of the company.

*431Stamper contends that his contract with Gammill should be construed as providing that he (Stamper) should receive 35%’ of the profits and not 35% of the intangible right to control the company which rested in Gammill because of proxies granted to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Griffin v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API