Legal Opinion
United States v. Savides
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 20, 1987No. 87 CR 17PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
This order concerns defendant Savides’ supplemental motion to suppress evidence seized from his residence and defendants Besase, Pace, and Greco’s motions to suppress evidence seized from their persons and vehicles. For the reasons stated herein, Savides and Greco’s motions are granted in part and denied in part. Besase and Pace’s motions are denied.
FACTS
Pursuant to defendants’ requests, this court held extensive pretrial hearings over a period of weeks at which testimony concerning the issues at dispute was offered. The following rendition of relevant facts is based…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Joseph Pace, Anthony Besase, Christ Savides, Donald Smith, John Cialoni, and Robert WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. One 1987 Ford F-350 4× 4 PickupDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- People v. BanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990