Legal Opinion
Dr Pepper/Seven-Up Companies, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 20, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-2712 (GHR)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION
REVERCOMB, District Judge.
Before the Court are the cross-motions for summary judgment of plaintiffs Dr Pepper/Seven-Up Companies, Inc. (“DPSU”) and Harold A. Honickman (“Honickman”), and defendant Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “the Commission”). At issue is whether the FTC’s decision to deny Honickman’s application for prior approval to acquire certain assets of the Seven-Up Brooklyn Bottling Company (“Seven-Up Brooklyn”) — an application made pursuant to a Consent Order between Honickman and the FTC — is arbitrary and capricious, violates Honickman’s due process…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dr Pepper/seven-Up Companies, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Dr Pepper/Seven-Up Companies, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993