Legal Opinion

Haynie v. Tideland Welding Service

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 4, 1980No. 80-3218PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATE, Circuit Judge:

The plaintiff-appellant, Fred Haynie, was injured on an offshore oil rig and instituted suit against Tideland Welding Service (Tideland) and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USFG), Tideland’s insurer, under the provisions of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 901, et seq. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that Haynie was not an “employee” of Tideland, 33 U.S.C. § 902, therefore denying his claim for compensation under the LHWCA; this decision was affirmed by the Benefits Review Board. Haynie appeals from the decision of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Banks v. Chicago Grain Trimmers Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Oilfield Safety and MacHine Specialties, Inc. And the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Harman Unlimited, Inc., Gray & Company, Inc. Charles Hansen and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U. S. Department of Labor, Harman Unlimited, Inc. And Gray & Company, Inc. v. Oilfield Safety, Inc., Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Charles Hansen and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U. S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Symanowicz v. Army And Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Symanowicz v. Army & Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Haynie v. Tideland Welding ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API