Winchester v. Jackson & Evans
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Per curiam
As a complete statement of this canse has been given in the opinion heretofore declared (Cooke’s R. 421), and as the cause is familiar to the bar, I do not deem it necessary to go into a statement of it. It occurs to me that this case divides itself into * the three following propositions, viz: 1st, Ought the judgment in Pennsylvania, if the facts of this case were then known, to have been rendered in the way in which it has been rendered; or ought the present defendants to have recovered in that court anything against the complainant? 2d, Is the record of the judgment in Pennsylvania…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eisenbach v. HatfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Thorn v. BlanchardCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1809
- Knox v. Work, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1809
- Wilson v. RobertsonTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity · 1808