Legal Opinion

Winchester v. Jackson & Evans

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1817Published

1Per curiam

As a complete statement of this canse has been given in the opinion heretofore declared (Cooke’s R. 421), and as the cause is familiar to the bar, I do not deem it necessary to go into a statement of it. It occurs to me that this case divides itself into * the three following propositions, viz: 1st, Ought the judgment in Pennsylvania, if the facts of this case were then known, to have been rendered in the way in which it has been rendered; or ought the present defendants to have recovered in that court anything against the complainant? 2d, Is the record of the judgment in Pennsylvania…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eisenbach v. HatfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Thorn v. BlanchardCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1809
  3. Knox v. Work, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1809
  4. Wilson v. RobertsonTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity · 1808

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API