Waddington v. Stores Mutual Protective Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
1. While an agent is a competent witness either for or against his principal, his interest going to his credit, the declarations of an agent as to the business transacted by him are not admissible against his principal unless they are part of the negotiations constituting the res gestas, or unless the agent is dead. Code of 1933, § 4-315. Declarations accompanying an act, or so nearly connected therewith in time as to be free from all suspicion of device or afterthought, are admissible in evidence as part of res gestae. § 38-305. The admissions of an agent or attorney in fact, during the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. HarrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Exposition Cotton Mills v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Colt Co. v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Smith v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Waddington v. Stores Mutual Protective Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- Results Oriented, Inc. v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Hodges v. Putzel Electric Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Akridge v. Atlanta Journal Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Butler v. Bolton Road PartnersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Ludi v. Van MetreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.