Legal Opinion

Sharpe v. Hartman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah: Loyal B. Stearns, Judge. This was originally a suit by Penumbra Kelly and others to wind up the affairs of the Northwest Loan and Trust Company, an alleged banking concern in the City of Portland, manipulated by one George B. Markle.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Multnomah: Loyal B. Stearns, Judge. This was originally a suit by Penumbra Kelly and others to wind up the affairs of the Northwest Loan and Trust Company, an alleged banking concern in the City of Portland, manipulated by one George B. Markle. The defendant Hartman was appointed receiver in the summer of eighteen hundred and ninety-three, and afterward Kate H. Morgan Sharpe intervened claiming a preference for certain gold coin delivered to the trust company for the purpose of paying a mortgage, but which it had converted to its own use. The court below disallowed the preference,…

1Per curiam

The facts in the case bring it within the ruling this day announced in Ferchen v. Arndt, 26 Or. 121, and an order will be entered accordingly.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ferchen v. ArndtOregon Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. ConnollyOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Muhlenberg v. Northwest Loan & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. First National Bank v. ConnollyOregon Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API