Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rivas v. Chelsea Housing Authority

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 31, 2011No. 10-P-976Published

1DissentMills, J.

By regulation, 760 Code Mass. Regs. § 6.08(4)(b) (1998), the Chelsea Housing Authority (authority) was required to notify Rivas of her right to an informal settlement conference and to conduct such a conference prior to formal grievance proceedings. Because, in the absence of such a conference, the authority’s decision was made upon unlawful procedure, and because I conclude that this unlawful procedure prejudiced her substantial rights, I would reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

1. Unlawful procedure, a. Waiver. The majority first…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cabot Corp. v. AVX Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. Albert v. Municipal Court of the City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Royce v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Yerardi's Moody Street Restaurant & Lounge, Inc. v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  5. Spence v. GormleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API