Cushman v. Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the district court for Ramsey county, entered upon the report of a referee. The opinion and the cases cited therein contain a full statement of the origin of the thirteen bonds, upon one of which the present action is brought.
Read the full summary
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the district court for Ramsey county, entered upon the report of a referee. The opinion and the cases cited therein contain a full statement of the origin of the thirteen bonds, upon one of which the present action is brought. In this case the complaint alleges that the bonds were issued pursuant to a resolution passed by the defendant April 10, 1857; while the referee finds that on the 23d May, 1857, the resolution of April 10, 1857 was. rescinded, and another and different resolution was passed, pursuant to which the thirteen bonds were issued by…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Berry, J.
This action is brought to i’ecover the principal and interest of one of a series of thirteen bonds issued by the defendant, being the same bonds which are considered and passed upon in Chaska Company vs. The Board of Supervisors of Carver County. 6 Minn. 204. In that case it was held, that the board of commissioners had authority to issue said thirteen bonds and that the same were valid and binding upon the county. In Nininger vs. The Board of Commissioners of Carver County, 10 Minn, 133, the validity of one of these same bonds came in question again, and in disposing of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chaska Co. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rogers v. Le Sueur CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Sunderland v. EblingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915